Summary

Portrait of Morrison Waite Morrison Waite Littlefield v. Perry — Opinion of the Court

It is well settled that a recorded assignment of a perfected invention, made before a patent has issued, carries with it the patent when issued, [7] and that reissues are not patents for new inventions, but amendments of old patents. If a reissue is obtained with the consent of an assignee, it inures at once to his benefit; if without, he has his election to accept or reject it.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Morrison Waite Morrison Waite Littlefield v. Perry — Opinion of the Court

The Circuit Court has jurisdiction of all suits arising under the patent laws, and has power, upon a bill in equity filed by a party aggrieved, to grant injunctions, according to the course and principles of courts of equity, to prevent the violation of any right secured by patent. Every patent, or any interest therein, is by statute made assignable by an instrument in writing, and the patentee or his assignee may, in like manner, grant and convey an exclusive right under his patent throughout any specified part of the United States.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Morrison Waite Morrison Waite Littlefield v. Perry — Opinion of the Court

An assignment of an imperfect invention, with all improvements upon it that the inventor may make, is equivalent in equity to an assignment of the perfected results. The assignment in this case being such a one, the assignees became in equity the owners of the patent granted upon the perfected invention; that is to say, of the patent of 1854. Littlefield took the legal title in trust for them, and should convey. Courts of equity in proper cases consider that as done which should be.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature