Article III judiciary

Definition and stakes

by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois,  In re African-American Slave Descendants Litigation… (2005 | noyear)

“ Second, the requirement of a case or controversy serves to "define the role assigned to the judiciary in a tripartite allocation of power to assure that the federal courts will not intrude into areas committed to the other branches of government." Id. This "dual limitation" found in the requirement of a case or controversy is enforced by what have been termed the justiciability doctrines of Article III, which state the fundamental limits on federal judicial power in our system of government. ”
Source: Wikisource

Glidden Company v. Zdanok Lurk…

“ The fact that Article III judicial power may be so divided as to produce judges with no experience in the trial of jury cases or in the review of them on appeal is no excuse for allowing legislative judges to be imported into the important fields that Article III preserves and that are partly safeguarded by the Bill of Rights and partly represented by ancient admiralty practice [70] and equity procedures. Federal judges named to Article III courts are picked in light of the functions entrusted to them. ”
Source: Wikisource

United States Senate, Committee on the Judiciary,  Copyright Law Revision (Senate Report No… (1975)

“ Under the provisions of section 208 a retailer who does not himself induce the manufacture or importation of an infringing article need not concern himself with whether or not any given item infringes a protected design. The retailer is under no duty to find out. Even if a retailer has knowledge that an article infringes a design when he buys it, this places no additional burden on him. In any event, a retailer may dispose of all stock on hand or on order at the times he receives notice of the protection of a design. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature