Judicial interpretation

Definition and stakes

Portrait of Benjamin Nathan Cardozo Benjamin Nathan Cardozo,  The Nature of the Judicial Process (1921)

“ How far if at all the needful changes can or ought to be carried out by judicial decisions of the development of legal theory, and how far the intervention of the legislator will be called for, is a matter that will vary from one legal territory to another according to the accepted traditions as the binding force of precedents, the character of the enacted law, and the wider of narrower liberty of judicial interpretation. ”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Benjamin Nathan Cardozo Benjamin Nathan Cardozo,  The Nature of the Judicial Process (1921)

“ My duty as judge may be to objectify in law, not my own aspirations and convictions and philosophies, but the aspirations and convictions and philosophies of the men and women of my time. Hardly shall I do this well if my own sympathies and beliefs and passionate devotions are with a time that is past. "We shall never be able to flatter ourselves, in any system of judicial interpretation, that we have eliminated altogether the personal measure of the interpreter. In the moral sciences, there is no method or procedure which entirely supplants subjective reason. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature