Obstruction of justice refers to actions that hinder legal inquiries or judicial procedures, including offenses such as false testimony, intimidation of witnesses, or the deliberate removal of evidence. This topic has been examined by writers like Cesare Beccaria, who criticized legal formalities as instruments of oppression, and Émile Zola, who portrayed systemic injustice through the depiction of repressive judicial systems. Anna Harriette Leonowens denounced the misuse of power as a crime against humanity, while A.
M. Sullivan raised the question of whether resistance to judicial rulings could be considered an instance of obstruction. These differing viewpoints emphasize the conflict between authority and responsibility, portraying obstruction not only as a legal transgression but also as a moral and structural shortcoming. The interaction between legal interpretations and literary analyses illustrates how this theme exposes the vulnerability of justice when faced with corruption or institutional prejudice.