Tartar emetic

Definition and stakes

Alexander Wynter Blyth,  Poisons, Their Effects and Detection

“ Effects of Tartar Emetic on Man. [807] —The analogy between [584] the symptoms produced by arsenic and antimony is striking, and in some acute cases of poisoning by tartar emetic, there is but little (if any) clinical difference. If the dose of tartar emetic is very large, there may be complete absence of vomiting, or only a single evacuation of the stomach. Thus, in a case mentioned by Taylor, in which a veterinary surgeon swallowed by mistake 13 grms. (200 grains) of tartar emetic, vomiting after fifteen minutes could only be induced by tickling the throat. ”
Source: Gutenberg

Various,  North Carolina Medical Journal…

“ I prefer ipecac to tartar emetic, because the action of the former is more gentle and more constant, and because tartar emetic irritates the mucous membrane of the stomach. After ipecac, the patient remains calm, whilst after tartar emetic, the nausea continues, and is very often followed by diarrhœa. I insist strongly on patiently awaiting the effect of the ipecac before giving warm water, because prematurely swallowed, this embarrasses instead of promoting the effect of the medicine. ”
Source: Gutenberg

Sir Robert Christison,  Treatise on Poisons

“ There is little peculiarity in what is hitherto known of the symptoms of poisoning with tartar-emetic in man. Cases in which it has been taken to the requisite extent are rarely met with; and it has seldom remained long enough in the stomach to act deleteriously. But its action on animals would appear from the experiments of Magendie to be in some respects peculiar.
He found that dogs, like man, may take a large dose with impunity, for example half an ounce, if they are allowed to vomit; but that if the gullet is tied, from four to eight grains will kill them in a few hours.
”
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature