Summary

Portrait of Thomas Henry Huxley Thomas Henry Huxley Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London (1870)

But to name this great pelvic bone was a difficulty with me. I was under the impression that its broad, smoothly expanded surface might be best compared with that of an ischium [3] or pubis, and that this would be more suited to the broad depressed body (as I supposed it to be) of such a huge creature, than, by accepting it as an ilium, to admit the beast to have been narrow in the rear, like a bird, with the plane of the bone not much inclined from the vertical.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Thomas Henry Huxley Thomas Henry Huxley Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London (1870)

Even in point of etymological appropriateness, the term "Dinosauria" is no more fitting for reptiles of which some are small, than "Pachypoda" is for reptiles of which some have slender feet; but as Von Meyer's name has never obtained much currency, it may be well to allow justice to give way to expediency, and to retain the name of Dinosauria for those reptiles which agree in all the most important and characteristic parts of their structure with Megalosaurus and Iguanodon.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Thomas Henry Huxley Thomas Henry Huxley Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London (1870)

If the tibia without that epiphysis and the astragalus were found in the fossil state, I know not by what test they could be distinguished from the bones of a Dinosaurian. And if the whole hind quarters, from the ilium to the toes, of a half-hatched chicken could be suddenly enlarged, ossified, and fossilized as they are, they would furnish us with the last step of the transition between Birds and Reptiles; for there would be nothing in their characters to prevent us from referring them to the Dinosauria.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature