Mīmāṃsā

Definition and stakes

Hans Julius Eggeling,  1911 Encyclopædia Britannica (1911)

“ Among the different systems, six are generally recognized as orthodox, as being (either wholly or for the most part) consistent with the Vedic religion—two and two of which are again more closely related to each other than to the rest, viz.:
(1) Pūrva-mīmāṃsā (Mīmāṃsā) , and (2) Uttara-mīmāṃsā (Vedānta) ; (3) Sānkhya, and (4) Yoga; (5) Nyāya, and (6) Vaiśeshika. 1. The (Pūrva-) Mīmāṃsā is not a system of philosophy in the proper sense of the word, but rather a system of dogmatic criticism Mīmāṃsā.
”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Arthur Anthony Macdonell Arthur Anthony Macdonell,  A History of Sanskrit Literature

“ The oldest commentary in existence on the Mīmāṃsā Sūtras is the bhāshya of Çabara Svāmin, which in its turn was commented on about 700 A.D. by the great Mīmāṃsist Kumārila in his Tantra-vārttika and in his Çloka-vārttika, the latter a metrical paraphrase of Çabara’s exposition of the first aphorism of Patanjali. Among the later commentaries on the Mīmāṃsā Sūtras the most important is the Jaiminīya-nyāya-mālā-vistara of Mādhava (fourteenth century) .
Far more deserving of attention is the theoretical system of the Uttara-Mīmāṃsā, or “Second Inquiry.”
”
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature