Excise duty

Definition and stakes

Portrait of F. H. Bradley F. H. Bradley,  Ethical Studies — Essay IV. (1876)

“ All that it comes to is this (and it is, we must remember, a very important truth) , that you must never break a law of duty to please yourself, never for the sake of an end not duty, but only for the sake of a superior and overruling duty. Any breach of duty, as duty, and not as lower duty, is always and absolutely wrong; but it would be rash to say that any one act must be in all cases absolutely and unconditionally immoral. Circumstances decide, because circumstances determine the manner in which the overruling duty must be realized. ”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of G. E. Moore G. E. Moore,  Ethics — Chapter V (1912)

“ But, no doubt, what is meant by many who urge this objection is to deny this. What they mean to say is not merely that to call an action expedient is a different thing from calling it a duty, but also that sometimes what is expedient is wrong, and what is a duty is inexpedient. This is a view which is undoubtedly often held; people often speak as if there often were an actual conflict between duty and expediency. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature