| editor

Summary

| editor,  The Zoologist (1900)

“ In philosophy there is great change, but no new creed. It is undoubtedly the case that a naturalist may exist without being an evolutionist; it is equally true that evolutionists can be found who are neither Lamarckians nor Darwinists; and it is certain that Darwinists are to be found in plenty who are quite outside the school of neo-Darwinism, and who have no desire to risk wrecking a great conception on speculative side issues. Hence 'The Zoologist' welcomes all phases of thought, but stipulates for facts rather than theories, argument more than advocacy. ”
Source: Wikisource

| editor,  The Zoologist (1843)

“ White is now no more, but his mantle has fallen upon others:—a multitude of observers have arisen in the same field, and, what is more to my purpose, have become contributors to the pages of 'The Zoologist.' Nature herself is exhaustless: our field of observation is wider, a thousand-fold, than White ever enjoyed; our capacity for observation is certainly not less. These are the grounds I have for hoping that 'The Zoologist' will succeed.
I beg to offer my warmest thanks to those naturalists who have by their contributions rendered me such important assistance.
”
Source: Wikisource

| editor,  The Zoologist (1901)

“ This year the International Congress held its meeting at Berlin, while the publication of books relating to animal life is ever on the increase; and, though much of this literature may be of a compilative description, and designed for "popular" uses, it still proves that the reading public are not uninterested in the animal life around them. On all sides Zoology receives a fresh support. It is no longer the sluggard who is bid to study the way of the Ant, but the philosopher, and even the politician. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature