T. F. Young, An account of some recent discoveries in hieroglyphical literature… (1823)
“ We have, however, no evidence that Philometor’s dates extended beyond 35, and we must naturally consider this 36 as belonging to Eupator, corresponding to 135 B. C. which was 11 years after the death of Philometor. If we judged from this manuscript alone, we should infer that Eupator was canonized, by some accident, during his temporary reign, before his brother, and that the order of the names remained undisturbed through the different changes of their governments. The [Pg 76] epithet “Illustrious” in this preamble is not easily recognised ”
