Abacus (architecture)

Definition and stakes

John Slater,  Architecture: Classic and Early Christian

“ These generally formed the faces of a pair of cushion-shaped features, which could be seen in a side view of the capital; but sometimes volutes stand in a diagonal position, and in almost every building they differ slightly. The abacus is less deep than in the Greek Doric, and it is always moulded at the edge, which was never the case with the Doric abacus. The entablature (Fig. 70) is, generally speaking, richer than that of the Doric order. The architrave, for example, has three facias instead of being plain. On the other hand, the frieze has no triglyphs, and but rarely sculpture. ”
Source: Gutenberg

Charles Herbert Moore,  Development and Character of Gothic Architecture (1890)

“ In its main mass it is well formed as a member connecting the slender shaft with its heavy load. The Corinthianesque profile of its bell is at once functional and graceful. The round abacus, a form which agrees better than the square with the arch sections employed, presents no overhanging angles requiring support from crockets. ”
Source: Wikisource

Sir George Gilbert Scott,  Lectures on the rise and development of medieval architecture…

“ The advantages of the angular abacus are, that it allows of the capitals indicating the direction of the arch-ribs, and assuming irregular forms suggested by them (Fig. 97) , which the round form forbids; that it allows of the use of square orders, and, consequently, of simpler and more effective arch mouldings than can be placed in the round abacus, on which the mouldings have to be somewhat crushed in their section, and their parts multiplied, to bring them nicely on to the round support; and that the angles indicate the direction towards which the main stalks of the foliage should tend. ”
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature