“ To the extent practicable and permitted by law, no agency shall promulgate any regulation that is not required by statute, that has federalism implications, and that imposes substantial direct compliance costs on States and local governments, unless: (1) funds necessary to pay the direct costs incurred by the State or local government in complying with the regulation are provided by the Federal Government ”
Federal regulation
Definition and stakes
Quotes about “federal regulation”
Mahlon Pitney, Corn Products Refining Company v…
“ For when the question is whether a federal act overrides a state law, the entire scheme of the statute must, of course, be considered, and that which needs must be implied is of no less force than that which is expressed. If the purpose of the act cannot otherwise be accomplished-if its operation within its chosen field else must be frustrated and its provisions be refused their natural effect-the state law must yield to the regulation of Congress within the sphere of its delegated power. ”
Hugo Black,
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association…
“ If an activity is held to be interstate commerce, Congress has paramount regulatory power. If it acts at all in relation to such a subject, it often has been held that it has 'occupied the field' to the exclusion of the states, that the federal legislation defines the full measure of regulation and outside of it the activity is to be free. ”
William O. Douglas,
Allen-Bradley Local No. 1111 v…
“ The delicacy of the issues which were posed alone raised grave questions as to the propriety of allowing a state system of regulation to function alongside of a federal system. In that field any 'concurrent state power that may exist is restricted to the narrowest of limits'. ”
Warren E. Burger,
First National Bank in Plant City v…
“ The mechanism of referring to state law is simply one designed to implement that congressional intent and build into the federal statute a self-executing provision to accommodate to changes in state regulation. ”
Felix Frankfurter,
San Diego Building Trades Council v…
“ Administration is more than a means of regulation; administration is regulation. We have been concerned with conflict in its broadest sense; conflict with a complex and interrelated federal scheme of law, remedy, and administration. Thus, judicial concern has necessarily focused on the nature of the activities which the States have sought to regulate, rather than on the method of regulation adopted. ”
Stanley Forman Reed,
Cloverleaf Butter Co. v. Patterson…
“ When the prohibition of state action is not specific but inferable from the scope and purpose of the federal legislation, it must be clear that the federal provisions are inconsistent with those of the state to justify the thwarting of state regulation. ”
John Marshall Harlan II,
Hanna v. Plumer — Concurrence
“ To my mind the proper line of approach in determining whether to apply a state or a federal rule, whether 'substantive' or 'procedural,' is to stay close to basic principles by inquiring if the choice of rule would substantially affect those primary decisions respecting human conduct which our constitutional system leaves to state regulation. ”
Jonathan Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution (1907)
“ No person held to service or labor in one state, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in consequence of any law or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labor, but shall be delivered up, on claim of the party to whom such service or labor may be due. Sect. 3. New states may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new state shall be formed or erected within the jurisdiction of any other state ”
Hugo Black,
Hill v. State Of Florida Watson…
“ Yeomans, 301 U.S. 441, 454, 57 S.Ct. 842, 848, 81 L.Ed. 1210.10. 'States are thus enabled to deal with local exigencies and to exert in the absence of conflict with federal legislation an essential protective power. And when Congress does exercise its paramount authority, it is obvious that Congress may determine how far its regulation shall go. There is no constitutional rule which compels Congress to occupy the whole field. Congress may circumscribe its regulation and occupy only a limited field. ”
Robert H. Jackson, Davies Warehouse Company v. Bowles…
“ The custom of resorting to them to give meaning and content to federal statutes is too old and its use too diversified to permit us to say that considerations of nationwide uniformity must prevail in a particular case over our judgment that it is out of harmony with other objective more important to the legislative purpose. [20] What content we should give to the exemption in the case of a conventional utility not subject to a state regulatory statute or subject only to partial regulation is, of course, not before us. ”
William O. Douglas,
Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corporation…
“ The amendments to § 6 and § 29, read in light of the Committee Reports, say to us in plain terms that a licensee under the federal Act can do business 'without regard to State acts'; that the matters regulated by the Federal Act cannot be regulated by the States; that on those matters a federal licensee (so far as his interstate or foreign commerce activities are concerned) is subject to regulation by one agency and by one agency alone. [12] That is to say, Congress did more than make the Federal Act paramount over state law in the event of conflict. ”
Felix Frankfurter,
A. B. Kirschbaum Company v. Walling…
“ The body of Congressional enactments regulating commerce reveals a process of legislation which is strikingly empiric. The degree of accommodation made by Congress from time to time in the relations between federal and state governments has varied with the subject matter of the legislation, the history behind the particular field of regulation, the specific terms in which the new regulatory legislation has been cast, and the procedures established for its administration. ”
William J. Brennan, Jr., Federal Power Commission v. Southern California Edison Company…
“ The Secretary of the Federal Power Commission presented his views in letter form to the Senate Committee on Irrigation, and warned that 'there is no requirement that any Federal agency shall, in absence of State regulation or of interstate agreement, have any jurisdiction to reg late rates, services, or security issues of lessees, whether the power developed be or be not transmitted in interstate commerce.' See Hearings before the Senate Committee on Irrigation and Reclamation on S.Res. ”
William O. Douglas,
La Crosse Telephone Corporation v…
“ In practical effect the true measure of conflict between the state and federal scheme of regulation may not be found only in the collision between the formal orders that the two boards may issue. We know that administrative practice also disposes of cases in which no order has been entered. ”
L. Paul Bremer, Coalition Provisional Authority, Order 100: Transition of Laws, Regulations… (2004)
“ Section 6 shall be rescinded in its entirety and replaced with the following: “The Federal Government alone has the authority to carry out the functions and responsibilities set forth in this Regulation.” ”
Donald John Trump, Executive Order 13777 (2017)
“ In performing the evaluation described in subsection (d) of this section, each Regulatory Reform Task Force shall seek input and other assistance, as permitted by law, from entities significantly affected by Federal regulations, including State, local, and tribal governments, small businesses, consumers, non-governmental organizations, and trade associations. ”
Fred M. Vinson,
Amalgamated Association of Street Electric Railway Motor Coach Employees v…
“ Due regard for basic elements in our federal system makes it appropriate that Congress be explicit if it desires to remove from the orbit of State regulation matters of such intimate concern to a locality as the continued maintenance of services on which the decent life of a modern community rests.The real issue before the Court is whether the Wisconsin legislation os conflicts with the specific terms or the policy fairly attributable to the provisions of the federal statute that the two cannot stand together. ”
Constitution of Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (1974)
“ Federal administrative agencies and federal organizations shall be bound to ensure the enforcement of federal statutes and other federal regulations and enactments for whose enforcement they are responsible. In enforcing federal statutes and other regulations and enactments, federal administrative agencies and federal organizations shall have the right to exercise supervision in conformity with powers vested in them by federal statute. ”
Robert H. Jackson, Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Company…
“ When Congress enacts a statute that is complete in policy aspects and ready to be executed as law, Congress has recognized that enforcement is only an executive function and has yielded that duty to wholly executive agencies, even though determination of fact questions was necessary. ”
“ In addition to the fundamental federalism principles set forth in section 2, Executive departments and agencies shall adhere, to the extent permitted by law, to the following criteria when formulating and implementing policies that have federalism implications: (a) There should be strict adherence to constitutional principles. Executive departments and agencies should closely examine the constitutional and statutory authority supporting any Federal action that would limit the Policy-making discretion of the States, and should carefully assess the necessity for such action. ”
the Federal Trade Commission, Nixing the Fix (2021)
“ While the anti-tying provision gives consumers the right to make repairs on their own or through an independent repair shop without voiding a product’s warranty, repair restrictions have made it difficult for consumers to exercise this right. Although manufacturers have offered numerous explanations for their repair restrictions, the majority are not supported by the record. The auto industry has shown that in certain contexts, self-regulation can significantly increase consumers’ repair options. But other industries have not adopted similar self-regulation. ”
the Federal Trade Commission, Nixing the Fix (2021)
“ As the MOU illustrates, self-regulation can help address concerns about repair restrictions in discrete markets. But, no industry sector other than the automotive industry has worked to open repair markets through a self-regulatory framework. Ways to stimulate self-regulation in markets beyond the automotive sector, however, merit further consideration. ”
William O. Douglas,
Head v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in Optometry…
“ Thus the conflict in operation between the federal and state laws which converged in that case made it inevitable that the state law should yield in the interests of a particular federal regulatory scheme. ”
“ In order to reduce the regulatory burden on the American people, their families, their communities, their State, local, and tribal governments, and their industries; to determine whether regulations promulgated by the executive branch of the Federal Government have become unjustified or unnecessary as a result of changed circumstances; to confirm that regulations are both compatible with each other and not duplicative or inappropriately burdensome in the aggregate ”
Samuel Nelson, Benner v. Porter — Opinion of the Court
“ They are not organized under the Constitution, nor subject to its complex distribution of the powers of government, as the organic law; but are the creations, exclusively, of the legislative department, and subject to its supervision and control. Whether, or not, there are provisions in that instrument which extend to and act upon these Territorial governments, it is not now material to examine. We are speaking here of those provisions that refer particularly to the distinction between Federal and State jurisdiction. ”
Felix Frankfurter,
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation v…
“ Whatever the form in which the Government functions, anyone entering into an arrangement with the Government takes the risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the Government stays within the bounds of his authority. The scope of this authority may be explicitly defined by Congress or be limited by delegated legislation, properly exercised through the rule-making power. ”
Hugo Black,
Hines v. Davidowitz — Opinion of the Court
“ Little aid can be derived from the vague and illusory but often repeated formula that Congress 'by occupying the field' has excluded from it all state legislation. Every Act of Congress occupies some field, but we must know the boundaries of that field before we can say that it has precluded a state from the exercise of any power reserved to it by the Constitution. To discover the boundaries we look to the federal statute itself, read in the light of its constitutional setting and its legislative history. ”
Office of the Federal Register, Title 3 - The President, Code of Federal Regulations (2001)
“ To achieve this diversity, special attention shall be given to ensure placement in publications and television and radio stations that reach specific ethnic and racial audiences. Each department and agency shall ensure that payment for Federal advertising is commensurate with fair market rates in the relevant market. Each department and agency shall structure advertising contracts as commercial acquisitions consistent with part 12 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation processes and paperwork to enhance participation by 8 (a) s, SDBs, and MBEs. ”
Jonathan Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution (1907)
“ That the powers of government may be reassumed by the people whensoever it shall become necessary to their happiness; that every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by the said Constitution clearly delegated to the Congress of the United States, or the departments of the government thereof, remains to the people of the several states, or to their respective state governments, to whom they may have granted the same ”
Max Farrand, The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787 (1911)
“ Their regulations must ever interfere with each other, and perpetually disgrace and distract the Federal Councils. I must confess, I view the power of revision and of a negative as the corner stone of any reform we can attempt, and that its exercise by Congress will be as safe as it is useful. In a Government constituted as this is, there can be no abuse of it.—The proceedings of the States which merely respect their local concerns, will always be passed as matters of form, and objections only arise where they shall endeavor to contravene the Federal Authority. ”
Robert H. Jackson, Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Company…
“ This Act exemplifies the complexity of the modern lawmaking task and a common technique for regulatory legislation. It is typical of instances where the Congress cannot itself make every choice between possible lines of policy. ”
Robert H. Jackson, Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Company…
“ The only reason for the intervention of an administrative body is to exercise a grant of unexpended legislative power to weigh what the legislature wants weighed, to reduce conflicting abstract policies to a concrete net remainder of duty or right. ”
Jonathan Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution (1907)
“ But in the general government, its objects are enumerated, and are not confined, in their causes or operations, to a county, or even to a single state. No one power is of such a nature as to require the minute knowledge of situations and circumstances necessary in state governments possessed of general legislative authority. These were the reasons, sir, that, I believe, had influence on the Convention, to agree to the number of thirty thousand; and when the inconveniences and conveniences, on both sides, are compared, it would be difficult to say what would be a number more unexceptionable. ”
Owen J. Roberts, Vinson v. Washington Gas Light Company…
“ Bowles, supra, as to the scope of the Acts, but to infer from a general expression of congressional policy, the limitation of existing powers conferred by law on regulatory commissions throughout the nation, both state and federal, and the endowment of a different federal agency with new and superior rights and powers. ”
Felix Frankfurter,
National Labor Relations Board v…
“ The crux of the decision with regard to § 13 was that it announced no more than a rule of construction of the Federal Act. It was neither argued nor decided that § 501 (2) does not apply to § 13. There appears to be no support for such a conclusion either in the text of the Act or in its legislative history. ”
Jonathan Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution (1907)
“ It is, indeed, distressing to reflect that it ever should have been made a question, whether the Constitution, on the whole face of which is seen so much labor to enumerate and define the several objects of federal power, could intend to introduce in the lump, in an indirect manner, and by a forced construction of a few phrases, the vast and multifarious jurisdiction involved in the common law—a law filling so many ample volumes; a law overspreading the entire field of legislation ”
