Martin Paul Eve,
Open access and the humanities
(2014)
“ Hypothetically and provocatively: is it right that a mere two academics, in most instances, although sometimes only one, have the private, unaccountable, final word on an article’s or book’s acceptability, particularly when there has been intense debate over the statistical significance of the number of reviewers, even in scientific disciplines?6 For Early Career Researchers (ECRs) this private decision can be the difference between a lifetime of employment in academia and a lengthy period of retraining. ”
