Algernon Charles Swinburne and Margaret Bryant

Summary

Algernon Charles Swinburne and Margaret Bryant 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica (1910)

Only as Pollux was on one side a demigod of diviner blood than Castor can it be said that on any side Beaumont was a poet of higher and purer genius than Fletcher; but so much must be allowed by all who have eyes and ears to discern in the fabric of their common work a distinction without a difference. Few things are stranger than the avowal of so great and exquisite a critic as Coleridge, that he could trace no faintest line of demarcation between the plays which we owe mainly to Beaumont and the plays which we owe solely to Fletcher.
Source: Wikisource

Algernon Charles Swinburne and Margaret Bryant 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica (1910)

In another field than this Beaumont and Fletcher hold as high and secure a station of their own as any poet of their race. In perfect workmanship of lyrical jewellery, in perfect bloom and flower of song-writing, they equal all compeers whom they do not excel; the blossoms of their growth in this kind may be matched for colour and fragrance against Shakespeare’s, and for morning freshness and natural purity of form exceed the finest grafts of Jonson.
Source: Wikisource

Algernon Charles Swinburne and Margaret Bryant 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica (1910)

There is but one passage in all these noble plays which lifts us beyond a sense of the stage, which raises our admiration out of speech into silence, tempers and transfigures our emotion with a touch of awe. And this we owe to the genius of Beaumont, exalted for an instant to the very tone and manner of Shakespeare’s tragedy, when Amintor stands between the dead and the dying woman whom he has unwittingly slain with hand and tongue.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature