Removal (law)

Definition and stakes

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas,  City of Greenwood v. Peacock — Dissent

“ The critical words, so far as the present cases are concerned, are 'denied or cannot enforce in the courts or judicial tribunals' of the State or locality where they may be those rights which, in the most recent version of the removal statute, [3] are characterized as those secured by 'any law providing for the equal civil rights of citizens of the United States, or of all persons within the jurisdiction thereof.' [4]
It is difficult to discern whether the Court ascribes different meanings to the words 'is denied' and 'cannot enforce' as used in the statute.
”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Potter Stewart Potter Stewart,  Georgia v. Rachel — Opinion of the Court

“ Stauder and Rives thus teach that removal is not warranted by an assertion that a denial of rights of equality may take place and go uncorrected at trial. Removal is warranted only if it can be predicted by reference to a law of general application that the defendant will be denied or cannot enforce the specified federal rights in the state courts. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature