Interracial marriage

Definition and stakes

Deborah T. Poritz,  Lewis v. Harris — Concurrence/dissent (2006)

“ Most telling, the Court did not frame the issue as a right to interracial marriage but, simply, as a right to marry sought by individuals who had traditionally been denied that right. Loving teaches that the fundamental right to marry no more can be limited to same-race couples than it can be limited to those who choose a committed relationship with persons of the opposite sex. By imposing that limitation on same-sex couples, the majority denies them access to one of our most cherished institutions simply because they are homosexuals. ”
Source: Wikisource

Deborah T. Poritz,  Lewis v. Harris — Concurrence/dissent (2006)

“ Had the United States Supreme Court followed the traditions of the people of Virginia, the Court would have sustained the law that barred marriage between members of racial minorities and caucasians. The Court nevertheless found that the Lovings, an interracial couple, could not be deprived of “the freedom to marry [that] has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.” ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature