“ Ellipsis.—Ellipsis is the omission of a word or phrase necessary to the meaning of a sentence. An ellipsis is poor when the words omitted cannot readily be understood from the context. Pope's line, To err is human; to forgive, divine. is an illustration of good ellipsis because the word is can readily be substituted from the context. The following ellipses, however, are not good: Louis Flanagan is helping his brother Silas cut wood and numerous other things. ”
Ellipsis
Definition and stakes
Ellipsis, in linguistics and literature, refers to the omission of words whose meaning can be inferred from context, creating conciseness or emphasis. This phenomenon occurs in both grammatical structures, such as verb phrase ellipsis, and narrative techniques, where authors like M. Lyle Spencer emphasize its role in enhancing prose clarity, noting that effective ellipsis enables readers to seamlessly deduce omitted elements.
In literary contexts, Aristotle’s Poetics indirectly reflects ellipsis through its focus on plot and character interactions, while writers such as Agnes Repplier and Clayton Meeker Hamilton highlight its value in shaping narrative flow and character development. By balancing omission with contextual completeness, ellipsis functions as a bridge between linguistic efficiency and storytelling precision, revealing how brevity can amplify meaning.
Quotes about “ellipsis”
Aristotle,
The Poetics of Aristotle
“ Hence, the Plot is the imitation of the action: for by plot I here mean the arrangement of the incidents. By Character I mean that in virtue of which we ascribe certain qualities to the agents. Thought is required wherever a statement is proved, or, it may be, a general truth enunciated. Every Tragedy, therefore, must have six parts, which parts determine its quality—namely, Plot, Character, Diction, Thought, Spectacle, Song. Two of the parts constitute the medium of imitation, one the manner, and three the objects of imitation. ”
Agnes Repplier,
Essays in Miniature
(1892)
“ Those were not days, be it remembered, when people wrote fiction for the sake of introducing discussions. There still lingered in the novelist's mind the time-worn heresy that he had a story to tell, and that his people must act as well as talk. The plot—delightful and obsolete word!—was then in good repute, and conversation was mainly useful in helping on the tale, in providing copious love scenes, and, with really good novelists, in illustrating and developing character. ”
