Misbranding

Definition and stakes

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black,  United States v. Sullivan (332 U.S. 689…

“ I do not think Congress meant the phrase to be so disastrously limited. For the 'doing of any other act with respect to, a food, drug, device, or cosmetic' is prohibited by § 301 (k) only 'if such act * * * results in such article being misbranded.' And the statute provides, not a single common definition of misbranding for foods, drugs and cosmetics, but separate and differing sections on misbranded foods, misbranded drugs and devices, and misbranded cosmetics. ”
Source: Wikisource

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.,  United States v. Johnson (221 U.S. 488…

“ I take it to be conceded that misbranding may cover statements as to strength, quality, and purity. But so long as the statement is not as to matter of opinion, but consists of a false representation of fact,-in labeling the article as a cure when it is nothing of the sort from any point of view, but wholly worthless,-there would appear to be no basis for a constitutional distinction. It is none the less descriptive-and falsely descriptive-of the article. Why should not worthless stuff, purveyed under false labels as cures, be made contraband of interstate commerce, as well as lottery tickets? ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature