Research funding

Definition and stakes

David Gurwitz; Elena Milanesi; Thomas Koenig,  Grant Application Review: The Case of Transparency…

“ When it comes to the distribution of scarce funding resources for research in the biosciences, peer review has long been the undisputed champion of decision making. In recent years, its importance has only been enhanced, as many funding agencies increasingly distribute research funds through competitive instruments, and acquiring research funding is more important than ever for success in all branches of science [1] , [2] . Today, peer reviewing has gained as much legitimacy in the scientific world as well as among lay public. ”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Martin Paul Eve Martin Paul Eve,  Open access and the humanities (2014)

“ One of the most compelling arguments for legislated OA policies is that governments should assure public access to the results of publicly funded research. This argument is widely effective because it aims to accelerate the research we’ve already decided to fund with public money, increase the return on the public’s large investment in research, and improve fairness to taxpayers. There’s no downside for the public interest, only an incomplete upside. There is more public funding for scientific research than for humanities research. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature