Bloodletting

Definition and stakes

Toby A. Appel Bloodletting Instruments in the National Museum of History and Technology

As theories supporting bloodletting grew more complex, so too did the instruments.
Spontaneous forms of bleeding, including nosebleed, menstruation, and those instances produced by a blow to any part of the body, apparently inspired the earliest human bloodletters. The Egyptians claimed that the hippopotamus rubbed its leg against a sharp reed until it bled to remove excess blood from its body. [1] The Peruvians noted that a bat would take blood from the toe of a sleeping person when the opportunity presented itself. A deer, and goat, would pick a place near its diseased eye for relief.
Source: Gutenberg

Toby A. Appel Bloodletting Instruments in the National Museum of History and Technology

In this period it was considered an art to hold the lancet properly and to support the arm of the patient with delicacy and grace. [57] Many patients had by [Pg 12] repeated bloodlettings become inured to its potential danger and unpleasantness. In the mid-eighteenth century one British physician declared: “People are so familiarized to bleeding that they cannot easily conceive any hurt or danger to ensue, and therefore readily submit, when constitutional fear is out of the question, to the opening of a vein, however unskillfully advised.”
Source: Gutenberg

Toby A. Appel Bloodletting Instruments in the National Museum of History and Technology

By the time of Celsus, bloodletting had become a common treatment. Celsus remarked in his well-known account of early medicine: “To let blood by incising a vein is no novelty; what is novel is that there should be scarcely any malady in which blood may not be let.” [5] Yet criticism of bloodletting continued, for when Galen went to Rome in A.D. 164 he found the followers of Erasistratus opposing venesection.
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature